sariyawashere
sariyawashere sariyawashere
  • 04-06-2020
  • Social Studies
contestada

Question:
According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or
unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?​

Respuesta :

sindlea
sindlea sindlea
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:

It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.

Answer Link
kassidyjenna2014 kassidyjenna2014
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:unconstitutional

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

can you put 92 80 88 100 94 98 72 80 94 86 in order
Why does curleys wife offer to let lennie caress her hair ?
explain why habitat loss and habitat division are threats to biodiversity
A pair of snow boots at an equipment store in Big Bear that originally cost $80 is on sale for $56. What is the rate of discount?
Which claims are supported by relevant evidence? Select two options. Drinking coffee is good for you. Two recent studies have shown that coffee drinkers live
please help with math
Line segment AB was dilated to create line segment A'B' using the dilation rule DQ,0.15.What is x, the distance between points A and A'?2.4 units4.8 units13.6 u
How has the power of the federal government developed over time?
PLEASE HELP ? Find the length of BC A: 72 B: 54 C: 40.5 D: 108
What does this mean?